Gemma4All logoGemma4All

Can You Run Gemma 4 on a Mac Studio (96GB)?

Yes — best fit is Gemma 4 31B at BF16 (16-bit) (~58.3GB) Comfortable, using 91GB of usable memory on a 96GB Mac Studio.

Every Gemma 4 model on this configuration

ModelBest quantSizeStatus
Gemma 4 E2BBF16 (16-bit)~8 GB Comfortable
Gemma 4 E4BBF16 (16-bit)~15 GB Comfortable
Gemma 4 12BBF16 (16-bit)~26.7 GB Comfortable
Gemma 4 26B A4BBF16 (16-bit)~48 GB Comfortable
Gemma 4 31BBF16 (16-bit)~58.3 GB Comfortable

How we got this verdict

96 - 5 = 91GB usable (macOS and background processes reserve roughly 5 GB of unified memory).

Because Mac Studio has enough unified memory to spare, 31B fits at BF16 (16-bit)— a higher-precision quant than most setups get. You don't need the 4-bit QAT build here, though it's still a safe download if you want a smaller file for a second model running alongside it.

Going up to 128GB (128GB) doesn't change the top recommendation — 31B is still the best fit, just with more headroom.

Try a different configuration

🔍 Quick check: your Mac Studio with

Best fit: Gemma 4 31B · BF16 (16-bit) · ~58.3 GB Comfortable

31B 26B A4B 12B E4B E2B
Full breakdown for every model & quant →

FAQ

Can a Mac Studio (96GB) run the 31B flagship model?

Yes, comfortably — Gemma 4 31B fits at BF16 (16-bit) (~58.3GB), using 91GB of usable memory on this configuration.

What's the best Gemma 4 model for a Mac Studio (96GB)?

Gemma 4 31B at BF16 (16-bit) (~58.3GB) is the best fit — it's the largest model that runs comfortably within the 91GB of usable memory here.

What if I have more or less memory than 96GB?

With more (e.g. 128GB), you can run larger models or the same model more comfortably — see the Mac Studio page. With less (e.g. 64GB), the best-fitting model gets smaller or tighter — see the Mac Studio page.

Related